Dear DaraDear Dara: Wine Made Simple, Hooch Joked About, Food Enjoyed, and Life Made Slightly Better, Every Day.
ABOUT DARA     ARCHIVES     APPEARANCES     PRESS     MN MONTHLY              

Raise a Glass for J.D. Salinger. But Not a Wine Glass.

January 29, 2010

My thoughts about J.D. Salinger’s dying are almost infinite, he probably influenced me as a stylist more than any other writer. I’ve read everything he has ever published, and even spent a day in my early 20’s deep in the library stacks of bound journals gathering copies of his New Yorker stories that were never republished in book forms. But because the subject of this blog is drink and drinking, and Salinger often used drink and drinking in his work, I’ll confine myself to that. Let’s consider three instances of drink and drinking in Salinger’s work. First, the Tom Collinses in “Raise High the Roofbeams Carpenters” (1963), second the unspecified “highballs” made with “soda” (likely whisky and soda) in the short-story “Uncle Wiggly in Connecticut”, and finally the scotch and sodas of the Lavender Room and Wicker Bar scenes in “Catcher in the Rye” (1951).

So, why no wine? Well, as established in my book “Drink This” (2009), America’s wine-culture was essentially obliterated by Prohibition, 1920 – 1933, and only really got re-established in the late 1960’s/early 1970’s, when some of the wealthier members of the Greatest Generation left their first, money-making careers and took up winemaking, and other members of the Greatest Generation started drinking their wines. J.D. Salinger was born in 1919, and so most of his early years would have been during Prohibition, I think all of us can identify with the profound effect whatever is popular when you’re 14 has on the rest of your life, and when Salinger was 14 years old Prohibition was repealed, and America took to the streets to celebrate. But what were people drinking, specifically, when Prohibition was repealed? The same thing they were drinking during Prohibition; Cocktails, that is, glasses filled with bad-tasting booze, and lots of good stuff like bitters, ice, soda, juice, and so on to make the bad-tasting booze taste good. (The booze tasted bad because it was made by amateurs in the woods, or was good stuff from Canada cut and repackaged by mobsters. From what I’ve read it was very easy to get booze during Prohibition, but very hard to get good booze.) And so cocktails, and highballs, were what Americans drank all during Salinger’s important early writing years. And knowing your way around cocktail culture, in the 1950s, was the same as knowing your way around wine culture today. In the Lavender Bar scene in Catcher two of the hick-girls at the bar “were drinking Tom Collinses – in the middle of December, for God’s sake. They didn’t know any better.”

Where am I going with any of this? I don’t know. I’m sort of mourning on the page, mostly. But when I think of J.D. Salinger it’s as a product of his time, I think of him as a Modernist with a big M coming out of the tradition of John Dos Passos, trying to get American language and American culture into written prose. And he succeeded so wildly that most people don’t even see that — his written style, or his specific moment in time in American history. Instead people seem to see him as some sort of God who let us down by not continuing to write God-like books. Which I’d argue seemed God-like because they were written the way we Americans really hear language inside our heads. But now he’s dead. And I have tears in my eyes as I type this. I probably won’t raise a glass to Salinger this weekend because it’s too fresh and I’d cry, but sometime in the next few months I will. When I do it will be a scotch-and-soda made with a blended scotch, because that’s what they drank then, or a Tom Collins. And I’ll think of a real man, a real working writer developing a style, and a time, and I’ll say thank-you and good-bye.





Lead in Wineglasses: Safe? Yup, Pretty Much.

January 27, 2010

It’s going to be wine-glass week here at Dear Dara. So, what about lead in leaded crystal? Is it dangerous? Basically, no. The science on this seems to have been settled twenty years ago, and runs something like this: Wine leaches a miniscule, but detectable, amount of lead from a lead crystal wine-glass. There’s no meaningful amount of lead you can get from using a wine-glass during dinner. This 1991 article in the NY Times is a good summary, and here’s the money quote:

“Dr. Graziano said that crystal glasses posed “a negligible risk” because the amount leached was tiny, but that long-term storage in decanters could be a problem.”

So, don’t store port, brandy, wine or anything in lead-glass crystal for a long time. I was at a B&B in New Orleans once where they had a sideboard decanter ever-filled with Port, now I see that that was probably something bad to drink from. If you want to err on the side of utter caution you could avoid leaded crystal altogether, and if you feel paranoid this report from Canada Health will give you more background, but there’s lead in the ground, lead in the ocean water, lead in city water pipes, I think it’s one of those things where a sensible course is to figure that everything’s okay, unless otherwise specified.

Now, how do you know if your wine glasses have lead in them? If they’re very, very expensive and trumpeted the fact that they contained lead as a benefit on the packaging (leaded crystal is the prettiest). Or, if they’re very, very old and were once expensive, for instance if you inherited them or found them at an estate sale. Today only the most expensive wine-glasses contain lead, if you’re paying $2 or $12 for a new glass you can safely assume you are not drinking from anything with lead. My advice: Enjoy your leaded crystal if you’re lucky enough to have some!





Picking the Wines for Your Funeral…

January 26, 2010

I’m boning up on my wineglass history for today’s segment on our local NBC affiliate, and was reading a 1999 Wine Spectator article about Georg Riedel (rhymes with needle). Big picture: He brought the company back to life & profitability after it was nationalized by the Czech communist government after WW2, but he lives in fear that his company will be taken away from him again:

“I wake up every morning with fear,” he says. “I have this fear that someday, someone will take away my business. It’s pure fear of failing. The worst thing in my life would be that I would fail. From day one of my life I was born with this fear, and I can’t get rid of it. This makes me run.”

And it makes him plan everything, even the wines to be served at his funeral….Behind a wall lie…. 60 bottles of a top 1979 Austrian trockenbeerenauslese from Freie Weingärtner in the Wachau. Riedel has set aside these dessert wines for his funeral.”

“You know, I am planning many things,” says Riedel. “The last thing I can do is to plan what people drink at my funeral. Maybe it’s a day in November and it is raining and my friends will like to have a sweet wine.”

I suppose this makes sense, and yet… Do I also have to pick a cake? Write the guest list? Track down addresses? Pre-wrap gift-bags? Get the perfect dress and do a lot of Pilates to fit into it? I have to say, when I think of my own death, as I now am, the most appealing part seems like that it gets you off the hook vis a vis event-planning.





Pisco Primer — Don’t Be Caught With Your Pants Down!

January 18, 2010

You know how there’s a new chic liquor every year? Ever wonder why? I think the train leaves the station more or less like this:

  1. Somebody decides to import/export/increase selling of some obscure hooch, let’s call it cachaca. I mean absinthe. I mean rye! No, let’s just call it hooch.
  2. Anyway, said hooch vendors or marketers shoehorn every editor and journalist they find and ply them with the stuff.
  3. Finally, they find a journalist who just had a waterpump blow up on their old Volvo. (Only 6 journalists in America are currently wealthy enough to drive anything but elderly jalopies. See previous blog post: Journalism, the New Poetry.)
  4. This waterpump-desperate journalist pitches a story about the new hooch to every editor in the world.
  5. An editor, facing a holiday news-hole, or possibly mistaking this writer for the kid of someone she knew in college, assigns the story.
  6. In an effort to not get this flimsy story killed, this waterpump-jonesing journalist wildly overstates his case for the new hooch.
  7. The wildly overstated story runs!
  8. All the rivals of the editor take note, and assign stories of their own, not wanting to be caught off-trend.
  9. The waterpump is paid for! Oh glory day. The car lives on.
  10. The rest of us suddenly have to drink rye!

I bring this up because I have spied the next one coming: Pisco! A Chilean brandy. If you’re thinking Pisco… Sour. Yes! That’s the one. As my copy of the lovely book “Vintage Cocktails” (1999, Waggoner and Markel) tells it:

“Essentially a Collins without the fizz, a Sour is one of America’s oldest cocktails. The original, drunk when Scarlett O’Hara was still a toddler, was made with brandy and egg white. [What was so sour about that? -ed] That version was abandoned as French imports became less common and Southerners learned to distill their own spirits. By the early 1900’s, whiskey had replaced brandy as the spirit of choice for most Sour enthusiasts. During the 1920’s and 30’s, brandy reasserted itself in the form of the Pisco Sour, a cocktail made from Chilean pisco brandy, which was, at the time, readily available in the United States. [Because of guys with Tommy Guns running it over from our border with Santiago? -ed] Pisco is no longer a common bar finding, but if you sight a bottle, we heartily recommend it for consideration.

I have sighted a bottle! In the L.A. Times food section. Let’s ignore the flimsy sourcing from:

  1. A Harvard-educated (ooh!) sister who “oversees” a Pisco company. (Not owns, not manages, oversees. Hmm. Is heir to?)
  2. An Ica based enologist — who we can assume works for the Harvard sister.
  3. The Comisión Nacional del Pisco (ConaPisco) — which we can assume is the pork board of Pisco,  essentially the marketing partner of the Harvard sister.
  4. Two bartenders, whom we can assume were supplied by the Harvard-sister’s US distributor.

Anyway, I digress. What’s important here is: Pisco! It’s coming. It’s got “fire, with lots of body” but also expresses “terroir” and chic American bartenders are in a frenzy to put it in cocktails.

Of course, expressing terroir is a wine term, it refers to the way a particular parcel of grapes express various qualities of their particular parcel of land, the gunflint of the ground where Pouilly-Fumé grows and the way that comes across  in the scent of the wine, for instance. And of course, most winemakers who care about terroir would rather stab you in the eye than let you take their fancy wine and ‘steep it with yerba maté, combine it with lime and grapefruit syrup in a traditional maté gourd, and serve it with a silver straw, or bombilla.’ As one does with pisco. Also, straws are not generally used with things you want to savor the scent of, they’re more a git r’ done device. But whatever. Nothing in your rational mind is  important here. What’s important is: Pisco is coming your way! Pay attention! Read this article now or you are going to spend the next 6 months with more and more media stories about pisco popping up around you until you are forced to finally give in and think it’s really cool and order some. Save yourself the worry! And if you find this in a google search in 10 months, don’t say I didn’t warn you.





I’m in Wayzata at The Bookcase at 7 p.m. Monday Night!

January 10, 2010

Come on down to hear my read from the book and sign copies. Should be fun. Only one person so far has asked me to dedicate the book with a complex Latin inscription. That could have been a script in which I dedicated my soul to Loki for all I know, I just copied it from the piece of paper that was presented to me. So, will you be the first to ask for an inscription in ancient Greek? Come on, make my night!





Buttered Salad?

January 5, 2010

I just sat through a wine video at winespectator.com — I don’t really know why, mainly because I paid them a babillion dollars for the privilege, and secondarily because it had the improbable title “Cooking For Wine”, which snazzily abbreviates to C4W. Cooking For Wine? I mean, I understand the occasional prestige bottle you want to build a meal around, but how many times in life does that happen? Isn’t Cooking For Wine the rough equivalent of Cooking for Corn on the Cob, or Remodelling For Your Stamp Collection? Who’s in charge here? So, you buy an expensive bottle of wine and all of a sudden it’s bossing you around? I say throw off the shackles! Cook for yourself and your loved ones! Drink the wine! Show it who’s boss. Well, anyhoo the video turned out to mostly be a simple one showing one how to make butternut squash risotto, and then there was this weird part at the end about making a vinaigrette for a salad with brown butter and lemon juice — presumably so it would go with Chardonnay, as will be revealed in the next episode. (Vinegar is a notorious wine-killer.) Mmm. Buttered salad. Guess that’s where you end up when you willingly surrender your sacred free choice and free will to a bottle of grape juice.





A Quarter of Australia’s Vineyards to Close?

January 4, 2010

Sorry to have been away from the blog, life’s been making me anxious so I had to take a tech holiday over Christmas. I promised myself I’d put up one tiny thing before bed and was trolling about when I found something to make my anxiety spike through the roof: Holy Cow! The Sydney Morning Herald is reporting that Australia’s wine glut is so severe that wine is now cheaper in that drought-prone country than bottled water, and a full quarter of Australian vineyards may no longer be economically viable? Read more deeply into the article and you’ll find that the big thinkers in Australian wine’s big plan is to get U.S. consumers to spend more on Australian wine:

“The consumer in the US has got to realise that Australian wine above $US5 a bottle is as outstanding value as those at $US5.

“We have not got anywhere near to cracking that premium, super premium, ultra premium wine market in the United States. Our marketing program is only just beginning in those areas.” [...]

“We have got to break that nexus. Is it going to take two years, or three years, or five years? No, it’s going to take much longer”.

Yeah. Not bloody likely, mate. Because once you get into the over $10 and over $20 segment of the market you’re competing against the U.S. West Coast, France, Spain, Italy, and Germany — and I don’t know if that’s a fight you can win. All in all, I feel bad for the many, many people who are about to experience economic pain, but I wonder if we’ll all look back at the Critter Wine Label Years (that is, cute Australian wine labels with cute animals on them, like the jumping wallabys of Yellow Tail or the koalas of Koala Blue, etc.) the same way we look back at trends like Zima or parachute pants: What a strange, unique moment that was.








Available now!
(Amazon) (Barnes & Noble)



Wine T-shirts
Coming Soon!