Dear DaraDear Dara: Wine Made Simple, Hooch Joked About, Food Enjoyed, and Life Made Slightly Better, Every Day.
ABOUT DARA     ARCHIVES     APPEARANCES     PRESS     MN MONTHLY              

Daryl Hall, Cheap Bastard, Kind of A Genius

May 15, 2010

I can’t stop thinking about this interview that Daryl Hall, of Hall and Oates fame, gave to Wine Spectator in which he explained his method of stocking his wine cellar.

1) He put together a “rider”, that is, a list that goes to concert venues, of what must be in his dressing room. (Van Halen were the most famous abuser of a concert rider, specifiying ‘no brown m&m’s’ meaning that a concert venue employee had to sift by hand through a bag…)

2) On that list were all kinds of collectible Bordeauxs and other top-of-the-line wines.

3) If something wonderful was provided he would stick the bottle in his carry-on, and take it home to cellar it.

4) While, presumably, Oates sat on the side drinking a $2 bottle of Coors Light and his band-mate pocketed a $100 bottle of wine. But whatever.

Okay, so why can’t I stop thinking about this? Because:
1) People are so cheap! Millionaire pop celebrities, even, can’t stomach actually going to the store and buying $100, $150 bottles of wine. And I don’t mean this as a pejorative. I am cheap. I can count on three hands the number of over $100 bottles of wine I’ve bought with my own money and consumed for my own pleasure (as opposed to things I’ve consumed to write about, which would require many more hands.) As documented in this space, Sir Sean Connery is cheap. Human nature is cheap! Really amazing wine is not. The tension between those two points is just fascinating to contemplate.
2) It’s kind of genius asshole thing to do, because it’s both lazy (they bring the wine to me!) exploits market variations (who knows what strange out of the way bottle you’ll pick up at a random store in Kansas or Australia), and confers bragging rights: Look at the crazy stuff I have in my cellar.





I Won, I Won!

May 3, 2010

Won another Beard Award tonight — this makes 5! And have won three of the last four year’s wine journalism awards. I feel very happy, humbled. It verifies everything I’ve suspected about most food people needing a wine writer who can allow them to start knowing nothing and build rapidly, but it’s also a little sad in terms of the amount of push-back I get from various critics, wine pros, and gatekeepers of every sort who insist that what the world needs is more elite and complex criticism… Oh well. Happy day!





I’m at the Arden Hills Library Monday night at 7 p.m.!

March 20, 2010

Very much looking forward to my appearance at the Arden Hills, Minnesota public library Monday night at 7 p.m. Come on down, I think it will be an “intimate” event, that is, smallish, and if you do come we’d get plenty of time to chat one on one. Bring your Haskell’s sale catalog, I’ll circle some picks for you! They also will be giving away tickets to the Minnesota Book Awards gala. If you come to Arden Hills and then we see each other at the Gala I think that will make us official Christmas-card level friends. So come on down!





Happy Bubbly Birthday!

March 19, 2010

Got a letter from Erin, of Minneapolis:

Dear Dara,

I have been waiting for Drink This to come out since you first mentioned the idea in an article on red wine in the City Pages about five years ago. I was the receptionist at a distributor at that time and had just started to get to know wine. It was a revelation to read that article.

I have been reading your book, and loving it, and will do a Chardonnay tasting party with my family soon. But this is my birthday month and my girlfriends and I love Champagne. Here is my idea for a Champagne (should I put it in quotes?) tasting party: We will try the European sparkling wines you mention Cava (Cristolino?), Prosecco, Cremant de Loire; a sparkling white from California; a blanc de blanc and a blanc de noirs; and maybe Marchesi di Gresy Moscato d’Asti La Serra during dessert (just because I love it). I think I’ll serve a roast chicken (seasoned with thyme, lemon, and garlic and roasted along with onions, carrots and fennel). Am I on the right track? I am, like everyone else, on a tighter budget than I would like — do you have any suggestions for getting the most bang for my buck? I am super excited to have a Champagne tasting birthday party! Thanks for making it possible!

Erin, of Minneapolis

Erin,
You’re awfully sweet. You made my day. And: This is a great idea! Happy birthday!

As to your question: I love the idea of a bubbly tasting party — and for me, I’d indeed call it ‘bubbly’ just so you your guests don’t too weighed down with the idea of ‘Champagne’, which, of course, only comes from the Champagne area of France and is only made of three grapes (Chardonnay, Pinot Noir, and Pinot Meunier). The various bubblies you have here come from other places, and are made with other grapes (Moscato d’Asti is made with Moscato grapes, Cava contain any number of grape varietals, from Chardonnay to Spanish varieties like Macabeo or Parellada, and so on.) My next bit of advice would be to add a more expensive Cava to your tasting (expensive Cava tends to cost $16 – $25) because it will be more mushroomy, more complex, and give you a good point of reference. (Maybe drop the American bottle to make room for it; I’m not sure what it would add in this context.) Next, out of your two French bottles (the blanc de blancs and blanc de noirs) I’d stack the deck like this. First, I’d get a big-brand-name Champagne like Veuve Clicquot as one of them, and then a Grand Cru as another. The Grand Cru doesn’t have to be a budget killer, for instance the grand crus from Champagne Nicolas Feuillatte are maybe $60. So, why would I stack the deck like this? One, most people assume the big brand names like Veuve Clicquot are the best of the best, and if you don’t have one of those in there you or your guests may have a lingering feeling of: We’re drinking cheap, other people are drinking better. Two, this will give you a really firm foundation for the rest of your life (or at least for another decade!) to say: I like Cava because I like Cava, and I really, really do like it better than Veuve Clicquot.

Hope that helps, and hope you have the best birthday in the world.





A “Drink This” Triumph!

February 15, 2010

The whole reason I wrote Drink This was to help. So when I heard from a reader today about his Drink This triumph it made my day. The size and shape of the triumph was this: This reader went into a very classy, comprehensive, overwhelming liquor store and scored a bottle of wine he loved without feeling confused, intimidated, and possibly suckered. “Here’s what I did,” he told me. “I wrote down a list of names from the Pinot Noir chapter, marched in there, and found one of them. Obviously there’s teaching yourself stuff, but sometimes you just want a name on a piece of paper.” The bottle of wine he scored was the basic Argyle Pinot Noir “It was a $26 bottle of wine, which is a little more than I would ordinarily be comfortable buying, but it was such a great feeling to walk out of the chaos like: I can now look at a row of meaningless shapes and colors and get some help! Instead of walking out of the wine store like, oh, did I just totally f myself.” And he loved the wine.
Some weeks you feel like you do nothing right, and some weeks you hear something like this and it all feels all right.





“Home Is the New Normal” Also, Water Wet, Sky Up, Ground Down. Film at 11!

February 2, 2010

I love to periodically check out the dust-dry wine industry site Wine & Spirits Daily, because it’s full of all sorts of yummy ultra-dry nuggets of data, it’s like a Norwegian crisp-bread for a wine-writer’s mind. Dry nuggets like that wine sales are up 2.6% in 2009, the increase is driven entirely by wines under $15, and the biggest gainers are under $15 wines from California, Washington, Argentina, and New Zealand.

None of that is too unexpected, but the yummy dry nugget that just about knocked me out of my chair today was from Danny Brager, a VP at Nielsen, the trend-tracking-and-ratings company. Brager was explaining that there’s a general lack of consumer confidence, summarized WSD, “When consumers lack confidence, they tend to shy away from out-of-home entertainment. Increased ratings for the Food Network, higher cookbook sales (+9%) and increased traffic at food sites (+11%) show that consumers are cooking more at home.” Okay, yes, interesting. “All this has created a ‘new normal’ focused at home,” concludes Brager.

Yes, it was just reported as simple fact that in the recent past, “normal” was not at home — yet now it is.

Okie dokie, folks, that’s why I moved to the Midwest. I like me some common sense and good values. Um, dear wine-industry, home has always been normal. It was the old normal, it’s certainly it’s the new normal, and y’all need to stop working every night and visit yours. Home!

Home. Seriously. Home is the new normal. And thus concludes the frothy-credit of the 2000’s.





Raise a Glass for J.D. Salinger. But Not a Wine Glass.

January 29, 2010

My thoughts about J.D. Salinger’s dying are almost infinite, he probably influenced me as a stylist more than any other writer. I’ve read everything he has ever published, and even spent a day in my early 20’s deep in the library stacks of bound journals gathering copies of his New Yorker stories that were never republished in book forms. But because the subject of this blog is drink and drinking, and Salinger often used drink and drinking in his work, I’ll confine myself to that. Let’s consider three instances of drink and drinking in Salinger’s work. First, the Tom Collinses in “Raise High the Roofbeams Carpenters” (1963), second the unspecified “highballs” made with “soda” (likely whisky and soda) in the short-story “Uncle Wiggly in Connecticut”, and finally the scotch and sodas of the Lavender Room and Wicker Bar scenes in “Catcher in the Rye” (1951).

So, why no wine? Well, as established in my book “Drink This” (2009), America’s wine-culture was essentially obliterated by Prohibition, 1920 – 1933, and only really got re-established in the late 1960’s/early 1970’s, when some of the wealthier members of the Greatest Generation left their first, money-making careers and took up winemaking, and other members of the Greatest Generation started drinking their wines. J.D. Salinger was born in 1919, and so most of his early years would have been during Prohibition, I think all of us can identify with the profound effect whatever is popular when you’re 14 has on the rest of your life, and when Salinger was 14 years old Prohibition was repealed, and America took to the streets to celebrate. But what were people drinking, specifically, when Prohibition was repealed? The same thing they were drinking during Prohibition; Cocktails, that is, glasses filled with bad-tasting booze, and lots of good stuff like bitters, ice, soda, juice, and so on to make the bad-tasting booze taste good. (The booze tasted bad because it was made by amateurs in the woods, or was good stuff from Canada cut and repackaged by mobsters. From what I’ve read it was very easy to get booze during Prohibition, but very hard to get good booze.) And so cocktails, and highballs, were what Americans drank all during Salinger’s important early writing years. And knowing your way around cocktail culture, in the 1950s, was the same as knowing your way around wine culture today. In the Lavender Bar scene in Catcher two of the hick-girls at the bar “were drinking Tom Collinses – in the middle of December, for God’s sake. They didn’t know any better.”

Where am I going with any of this? I don’t know. I’m sort of mourning on the page, mostly. But when I think of J.D. Salinger it’s as a product of his time, I think of him as a Modernist with a big M coming out of the tradition of John Dos Passos, trying to get American language and American culture into written prose. And he succeeded so wildly that most people don’t even see that — his written style, or his specific moment in time in American history. Instead people seem to see him as some sort of God who let us down by not continuing to write God-like books. Which I’d argue seemed God-like because they were written the way we Americans really hear language inside our heads. But now he’s dead. And I have tears in my eyes as I type this. I probably won’t raise a glass to Salinger this weekend because it’s too fresh and I’d cry, but sometime in the next few months I will. When I do it will be a scotch-and-soda made with a blended scotch, because that’s what they drank then, or a Tom Collins. And I’ll think of a real man, a real working writer developing a style, and a time, and I’ll say thank-you and good-bye.





Lead in Wineglasses: Safe? Yup, Pretty Much.

January 27, 2010

It’s going to be wine-glass week here at Dear Dara. So, what about lead in leaded crystal? Is it dangerous? Basically, no. The science on this seems to have been settled twenty years ago, and runs something like this: Wine leaches a miniscule, but detectable, amount of lead from a lead crystal wine-glass. There’s no meaningful amount of lead you can get from using a wine-glass during dinner. This 1991 article in the NY Times is a good summary, and here’s the money quote:

“Dr. Graziano said that crystal glasses posed “a negligible risk” because the amount leached was tiny, but that long-term storage in decanters could be a problem.”

So, don’t store port, brandy, wine or anything in lead-glass crystal for a long time. I was at a B&B in New Orleans once where they had a sideboard decanter ever-filled with Port, now I see that that was probably something bad to drink from. If you want to err on the side of utter caution you could avoid leaded crystal altogether, and if you feel paranoid this report from Canada Health will give you more background, but there’s lead in the ground, lead in the ocean water, lead in city water pipes, I think it’s one of those things where a sensible course is to figure that everything’s okay, unless otherwise specified.

Now, how do you know if your wine glasses have lead in them? If they’re very, very expensive and trumpeted the fact that they contained lead as a benefit on the packaging (leaded crystal is the prettiest). Or, if they’re very, very old and were once expensive, for instance if you inherited them or found them at an estate sale. Today only the most expensive wine-glasses contain lead, if you’re paying $2 or $12 for a new glass you can safely assume you are not drinking from anything with lead. My advice: Enjoy your leaded crystal if you’re lucky enough to have some!





Picking the Wines for Your Funeral…

January 26, 2010

I’m boning up on my wineglass history for today’s segment on our local NBC affiliate, and was reading a 1999 Wine Spectator article about Georg Riedel (rhymes with needle). Big picture: He brought the company back to life & profitability after it was nationalized by the Czech communist government after WW2, but he lives in fear that his company will be taken away from him again:

“I wake up every morning with fear,” he says. “I have this fear that someday, someone will take away my business. It’s pure fear of failing. The worst thing in my life would be that I would fail. From day one of my life I was born with this fear, and I can’t get rid of it. This makes me run.”

And it makes him plan everything, even the wines to be served at his funeral….Behind a wall lie…. 60 bottles of a top 1979 Austrian trockenbeerenauslese from Freie Weingärtner in the Wachau. Riedel has set aside these dessert wines for his funeral.”

“You know, I am planning many things,” says Riedel. “The last thing I can do is to plan what people drink at my funeral. Maybe it’s a day in November and it is raining and my friends will like to have a sweet wine.”

I suppose this makes sense, and yet… Do I also have to pick a cake? Write the guest list? Track down addresses? Pre-wrap gift-bags? Get the perfect dress and do a lot of Pilates to fit into it? I have to say, when I think of my own death, as I now am, the most appealing part seems like that it gets you off the hook vis a vis event-planning.





Pisco Primer — Don’t Be Caught With Your Pants Down!

January 18, 2010

You know how there’s a new chic liquor every year? Ever wonder why? I think the train leaves the station more or less like this:

  1. Somebody decides to import/export/increase selling of some obscure hooch, let’s call it cachaca. I mean absinthe. I mean rye! No, let’s just call it hooch.
  2. Anyway, said hooch vendors or marketers shoehorn every editor and journalist they find and ply them with the stuff.
  3. Finally, they find a journalist who just had a waterpump blow up on their old Volvo. (Only 6 journalists in America are currently wealthy enough to drive anything but elderly jalopies. See previous blog post: Journalism, the New Poetry.)
  4. This waterpump-desperate journalist pitches a story about the new hooch to every editor in the world.
  5. An editor, facing a holiday news-hole, or possibly mistaking this writer for the kid of someone she knew in college, assigns the story.
  6. In an effort to not get this flimsy story killed, this waterpump-jonesing journalist wildly overstates his case for the new hooch.
  7. The wildly overstated story runs!
  8. All the rivals of the editor take note, and assign stories of their own, not wanting to be caught off-trend.
  9. The waterpump is paid for! Oh glory day. The car lives on.
  10. The rest of us suddenly have to drink rye!

I bring this up because I have spied the next one coming: Pisco! A Chilean brandy. If you’re thinking Pisco… Sour. Yes! That’s the one. As my copy of the lovely book “Vintage Cocktails” (1999, Waggoner and Markel) tells it:

“Essentially a Collins without the fizz, a Sour is one of America’s oldest cocktails. The original, drunk when Scarlett O’Hara was still a toddler, was made with brandy and egg white. [What was so sour about that? -ed] That version was abandoned as French imports became less common and Southerners learned to distill their own spirits. By the early 1900’s, whiskey had replaced brandy as the spirit of choice for most Sour enthusiasts. During the 1920’s and 30’s, brandy reasserted itself in the form of the Pisco Sour, a cocktail made from Chilean pisco brandy, which was, at the time, readily available in the United States. [Because of guys with Tommy Guns running it over from our border with Santiago? -ed] Pisco is no longer a common bar finding, but if you sight a bottle, we heartily recommend it for consideration.

I have sighted a bottle! In the L.A. Times food section. Let’s ignore the flimsy sourcing from:

  1. A Harvard-educated (ooh!) sister who “oversees” a Pisco company. (Not owns, not manages, oversees. Hmm. Is heir to?)
  2. An Ica based enologist — who we can assume works for the Harvard sister.
  3. The Comisión Nacional del Pisco (ConaPisco) — which we can assume is the pork board of Pisco,  essentially the marketing partner of the Harvard sister.
  4. Two bartenders, whom we can assume were supplied by the Harvard-sister’s US distributor.

Anyway, I digress. What’s important here is: Pisco! It’s coming. It’s got “fire, with lots of body” but also expresses “terroir” and chic American bartenders are in a frenzy to put it in cocktails.

Of course, expressing terroir is a wine term, it refers to the way a particular parcel of grapes express various qualities of their particular parcel of land, the gunflint of the ground where Pouilly-Fumé grows and the way that comes across  in the scent of the wine, for instance. And of course, most winemakers who care about terroir would rather stab you in the eye than let you take their fancy wine and ‘steep it with yerba maté, combine it with lime and grapefruit syrup in a traditional maté gourd, and serve it with a silver straw, or bombilla.’ As one does with pisco. Also, straws are not generally used with things you want to savor the scent of, they’re more a git r’ done device. But whatever. Nothing in your rational mind is  important here. What’s important is: Pisco is coming your way! Pay attention! Read this article now or you are going to spend the next 6 months with more and more media stories about pisco popping up around you until you are forced to finally give in and think it’s really cool and order some. Save yourself the worry! And if you find this in a google search in 10 months, don’t say I didn’t warn you.








Available now!
(Amazon) (Barnes & Noble)



Wine T-shirts
Coming Soon!